Ir al menú de navegación principal Ir al contenido principal Ir al pie de página del sitio
rd-24

Artículos

Año 7 No. 20 Mayo - Abril 2021

La función del prototipo en la investigación a través del diseño

DOI
https://doi.org/10.32399/icuap.rdic.2448-5829.2021.20.599
Enviado
junio 22, 2021
Publicado
mayo 15, 2021

Resumen

El papel de los prototipos de diseño en la investigación, es clave para la evolución del diseño hacia una disciplina con base académica consolidada;  actualmente su desempeño plantea importantes cuestiones que permiten una discusión sobre su legitimación en la producción de conocimiento útil. Entender los distintos tipos de investigación que existen alrededor de la disciplina del diseño, también ayuda a  desarrollar una cultura que genere conocimiento orientado a la práctica y aplicación del mismo, en la sociedad y en la ciencia. La investigación a través del diseño implica normalmente la construcción de un prototipo de diseño, que constituye el núcleo del proceso de investigación.

Citas

  1. Archer, B. (1981). “A View of the Nature of the Design Research”. En R. Jacques, & J. A. Powell (Ed.), Design:Science:Method. Guilford, Surrey: IPC Bussiness Press. Recuperado de https://catedrammo.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/archer_bruce_1981_design_science_method.pdf
  2. Archer B (1995). “The Nature of Research”. Co-Design. 2(6), [6-13]. Recuperado de: https://archive.org/details/TheNatureOfResearch/mode/2up
  3. Bayazit, N. (2004). “Investigating Design: A Review of Forty Years of Design Research”. Design Issues, 20(1), [16-29]. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/074793604772933739
  4. Bonsiepe G. (2007). “The Uneasy Relationship between Design and Design Research”. En Michel R. (Ed.) Design Research Now. Birkhäuser Basel: Board of International Research in Design. (pp. 21- 40) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-8472-2_2
  5. Buchanan, R., (1992). “Wicked Problems in Design Thinking”. Design Issues, 8 (2), [5–21]. Recuperado de https://web.mit.edu/jrankin/www/engin_as_lib_art/Design_thinking.pdf
  6. Bucheneau, M., & Fulton Suri, J. (2000). “Experience prototyping”. Trabajo presentado en Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Interactive Systems de ACM, New York, NY.
  7. Cross, N. (1984). Developments in design methodology. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Ed. Chichester.
  8. Cross, N. (1993). “Science and design methodology: A review”. Research in engineering design. 5(2). [63–69]. doi:10.1007/bf02032575
  9. Cross, N. (2001). “Designerly ways of knowing: Design discipline versus design science”. Design Studies, 17(3). [49-55]. http://users.metu.edu.tr/baykan/arch467/Readings/Cross01.pd
  10. Cross, N. (2006). Designerly Ways of Knowing. (N. Cross, Ed.). London: Springer London. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-301-9_1
  11. Cross N. (2007). “From a Design Science to a Design Discipline: Understanding Designerly Ways of Knowing and Thinking”. En Michel R. (Ed), Design Research Now. Birkhäuser Basel: Board of International Research in Design. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-8472-2_3
  12. Dalsgaard, P. (Enero 2010). “Research in and through design: an interaction design research approach”. Trabajo presentado en the 22nd Australasian Computer-Human Interaction Conference de OZCHI, Brisbane, Australia
  13. Dorst, K. (2011). “The Core of ‘Design Thinking’ and Its Application”. Design Studies, 32(6), [521–32]. Recuperado de https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142694X11000603
  14. Durrant, A. C., Vines, J., Wallace, J. & Yee., J.S.R. (2017). “Research Through Design: Twenty-First Century Makers and Materialities”. Design issues. 33 (3). [3-10]. Recuperado de https://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/DESI_a_00447
  15. Félix, M.J.; Santos, G.; Simoes, R. & Silva, J. (2020). “Practice-based design research knowledge production for quality assurance in design”. International Journal for Quality Research. 14(2) [647–660]. DOI: 10.24874/IJQR14.02-20
  16. Findeli, A., Brouillet, D., Martin, S., Moineau, C. & Tarrago, R. (2008). “Research Through Design and Transdisciplinarity: A Tentative Contribution to the Methodology of Design Research”. En Focused - Current Design Research Projects and Methods de Swiss Design Network Symposium. Berne, Switzerland.
  17. Frayling, C. (1993). “Research in art and design”. Royal College of Art Research Papers, 1(1). London: Royal College of Art.
  18. Giaccardi, E. (2019). “Histories and futures of research through design: From prototypes to connected things”. International Journal of Design, 13(3), [139-155].
  19. Godin, D. & Zahedi, M. (Junio 2014). “Aspects of Research through Design”. Trabajo presentado en The DRS 2014 Conference, Umeå Institute of Design, Sweden.
  20. Hauser, S., Wakkary, R., Odom, W., Verbeek, P. P., Desjardins, A., Lin, M., …Dalton, M. (2018). Deployments of the table-non-table: A reflection on the relation between theory and things in the practice of design research. Trabajo presentado en The Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (No. 201). New York, NY: ACM.
  21. Hirscher, A., Mazzarella F. & Fuad-Luke A. (2019). “Socializing Value Creation Through Practices of Making Clothing Differently: A Case Study of a Makershop With Diverse Locals”. Fashion Practice, 11(1), [53-80]. DOI: 10.1080/17569370.2019.1565377
  22. Jonas W. (2007). “Design Research and its Meaning to the Methodological Development of the Discipline”. En Michel R. (Ed), Design Research Now. Birkhäuser Basel: Board of International Research in Design. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-8472-2_11
  24. Kimbell, L. (2011). “Rethinking Design Thinking: Part I”. Design and Culture, 3(3), [285–306]. doi: 10.2752/175470811X13071166525216.
  25. Koskinen, I., Zimmerman, J., Binder, T., Redstrom, J., and Wensveen, S., (2011). Design research through practice: from the lab, field, and showroom. Waltham, MA: Morgan Kaufmann/Elsevier.
  26. Kurvinen, E., Koskinen, I., & Battarbee, K. (2008). “Prototyping social interaction”. Design Issues, 24(3), [46-57]. Recuperado de http://www.jstor.org/stable/25224182
  27. Lawson, B. (2005). How designers think (4th ed.). Oxford: Architectural Press.
  28. Lim, Y. K., Stolterman, E., & Tenenberg, J. (2008). The anatomy of prototypes: Prototypes as filters, prototypes as manifestations of design ideas. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 15(2), 7.
  29. Marchand, A. & Walker, S. (Octubre, 2007). “Connecting through Time: Old Objects, New Contexts, and Design-Centered Research for Sustainability.” Trabajo presentado en Connecting ’07 IDSA Education Symposium de ICSID/IDSA World Design Congress, San Francisco.
  30. Meroni, A., & Sangiorgi, D. (2011). Design for services. Gower Publishing, Ltd.
  31. Mikkonen, J. (2016). Prototyping Interactions. (Tesis doctoral). Tampere University of Technology, Finlandia.
  32. Odom, W., Wakkary, R., Lim, Y., Desjardins, A., Hengeveld, B & Banks, R. (2016). “From Research prototype to Research Product”. Trabajo presentado en CHI'16: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems de ACM, San José California.
  33. Sarli C. (2017). “El problema de diseñar en la complejidad: las metodologías y sus aportes teóricos”. Recuperado de https://maestriadicom.org/articulos/el-problema-de-disenar-en-la-complejidad-las-metodologias-y-sus-aportes-teoricos/
  34. Savic, S. & Huang J. (Junio, 2014). “Research ThroughDesign: What Does it Mean for a Design Artefact to be Developed in the Scientific Context?”. Trabajo presentado en 5th STS Italia Conference. A Matter of Design:Making Society through Science and Technology, Milan.
  35. Schön, D. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  36. Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
  37. Sitarz, H. (12 de Agosto 2019). “Research Through Design – in what way it facilitates innovation?”. [Entrada de blog]. Recuperado de https://mobeedick.com/blog/research-through-design-in-what-way-it-facilitates-innovation/
  38. Stappers, P. J. (2007). Doing design as a part of doing research. En Michel, R. (Ed.),Design research now: essays and selected projects. Basel: Birkhäuser.
  40. Stappers, P. J., & Giaccardi, E. (2017). Research through design. En M. Soegaard & R. Friis-Dam (Eds.), The encyclopedia of human-computer interaction (2nd ed.). Copenhagen, Denmark: Interaction Design Foundation. https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/book/the-encyclopedia-of-human-computer-interaction-2nd-ed
  42. Ullman, D. G. (2003). The mechanical design process. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
  44. Wensveen, S. & Matthews, B. (2014). “Prototypes and prototyping in design research”. En Rodgers, P., and Yee, J. (Eds). The Routledge Companion to Design Research. Florence, KY, USA: Routledge. (pp. 262-276).
  46. Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J., & Evenson, S. (2007). “Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI.” Trabajo presentado en Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems de ACM, New York, NY.
  47. Zimmerman, J., Stolterman, E., and Forlizzi, J., (2010). An Analysis and Critique of Research through Design: towards a formalization of a research approach. Trabajo presentado en The 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. Designing Interactive Systems, Aarhus, Denmark: ACM.